The Small Print Project                                       

ReasonableAgreement.org



Welcome to ReasonableAgreement.org — where we make mincemeat of End User License Agreements. As you move through space, as you look at the Web, when you buy things, when you travel, it’s increasingly the case that you end up making “agreements” to give up your rights. For example, by installing software, you might give up the right to sue the company that made it if it didn’t work. Or by subscribing to an online music service, you might give up your right to loan the songs you buy to a friend. When you install a game like World of Warcraft, you agree to install spyware on your computer. When you sign your credit-card slip at Best Buy or Fry’s, you waive all kinds of rights you get under consumer protection law.

Who knows if this stuff is enforceable? The case law is all over the place. What if you’re under-age? Drunk? Using someone else’s computer — do you agree on your parents’ behalf when you install software at their place over the holidays?


Frankly, it’s all bullshit. The way the system should work is, you buy something, you own it. The law of the land governs your interactions with the seller. What’s the point of having a consumer-protection law if all it takes to get around it is to announce that you’ve agreed to waive your rights by buying something? If consumer protection laws don’t protect people who buy stuff, whom do they protect?

That’s not to say that we can’t have reasonable agreements — like when you and your boss sit down and draw up your employment contract, negotiating the terms on which you’ll work. But the idea that an agreement can be made by shouting, “By standing there doing nothing, you agree to let me stab you in the eye!” is just dumb.

Enter the anti-EULA. Here’s the text of it:

READ CAREFULLY. By [accepting this material|accepting this payment|accepting this business-card|viewing this t-shirt|reading this sticker] you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.


Put this at the bottom of your emails; print it on your stationery. Stick it on the bottom of the credit-card slips at Best Buy, put it on your warranty cards before you mail them off. Print them on the back of your business-cards.

It’s no more enforceable than any of the other dumb-ass, abusive agreements out there, but this one works for you. It’s time to stop “agreeing.” It’s time to come up with some real, reasonable agreements.

The good people at Bumperactive have printed up stickers — receipt-sized, laptop-sized and bumper-sized — and MondoTees have t-shirts (”BY READING THIS T-SHIRT, YOU AGREE…”). I don’t make any money off of this, and part of every sale goes to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a charity that sticks up for your rights.

There’s no copyright in any of this. Make your own shirts, sell ‘em or give them away. Stickers, stationery, window-signs, door-knockers, welcome-mats — whatever. Do it, make as much dough as you can, just spread it around.

Buy stickers

Buy t-shirts

Submit abusive EULAs to the Small Print Project

(Thanks to Steve Simitzis and Cory Doctorow for this great idea)!

Comments

  1. January 27th, 2007 | 11:18 pm

    [...] The Small Print Project » ReasonableAgreement.org Welcome to ReasonableAgreement.org — where we make mincemeat of End User License Agreements. (tags: Tos corporate license EULA) [...]

  2. January 30th, 2007 | 10:20 am

    [...] folks ReasonableAgreements.org have created the anti-EULA (End User Licenses Agreement). Put this at the bottom of your emails; [...]

  3. February 2nd, 2007 | 5:57 am

    Terms of service…

    Cory Doctorow talks back to the online Terms of Service proffered by a bed outfit by the name of Sleeping Earthed (Boing Boing, Feb. 1)(more on EULAs/End User License Agreements)…….

  4. February 3rd, 2007 | 4:47 am

    [...] Small Print Project - ReasonableAgreement.org [...]

  5. howard bales
    February 3rd, 2007 | 10:16 am

    I have two ideas to further this cause.

    First, develop a small application that you run before installing software or clicking on a term of service. This app contains the anti-eula. Place this window over the offending EULA and click accept. In V2.0 you could tell the app where to click, and the app could force input for you. You click the ‘DISagree’ button on your app, and it pushes the accept button.

    The second idea is more powerful, and more work. Develop benchmark EULAs for various types of agreements. Offer these to the businesses that need EULAs. Rank EULAs so people can choose products with better ToS. Use the DISagree app to insert a user-selectable reasonable agreement. Offer a service to track the DISagreements that people make. If I get sued, I have documentation that I didn’t agree. If lots of people DISagree, the cause gains power.

  6. skitter
    February 3rd, 2007 | 1:04 pm

    Love the shir t:-)

    I’d like to see an “admittance-wrap” version that hinges on allowing you to enter the premises of a store or venue–even if they make you take off the shirt upon seeing it–so that the shirt does not have to be read to be “valid.”

  7. Commons
    February 3rd, 2007 | 7:27 pm

    Applying Work for Hire Laws
    ===============================

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_for_hire

    Most software companies are misusing the “Work for Hire” and copyright laws. Work for Hire laws are indented for companies to hire people to create artistic work or software for their own use, it is not intended for companies to resell the software created on “Work for Hire”.

    To resell an artistic work as per copyright laws, entity selling copyright should pay royalty for each copy to the author of the work. If software companies are not paying author/s of software for every copy sold then the software buyer “automatically” gets the right to make copies and resell them, because the software buyer is essentially buying software as “Work for Hire” form the software publisher since same work for hire and copyright laws applies for the “software publisher” as well as the “software buyer” isn’t it?

    For the software publisher to get the “right” for resale they should pay royalty to software author/s for each copy of the software sold as per the present copyright laws.

  8. February 4th, 2007 | 2:53 pm

    [...] More infos can be found here and here [...]

  9. ianrey
    February 5th, 2007 | 1:42 pm

    I think it would be even better - and more in line with sinister EULA’s I’ve seen - not to print the details in your own anti-EULA, but just to refer to it. “By accepting my payment for your software, you agree that you have read my terms and conditions at reasonableagreement.org.”

  10. February 12th, 2007 | 5:45 am

    [...] Thanks very much. Taken from the Small Print Project [...]

  11. February 17th, 2007 | 12:54 pm

    I added it to my email sig… really cool! :)

  12. February 20th, 2007 | 3:39 am

    [...] brilliant Agreement can be found here Posted inUncategorizedFebruary 20th, [...]

  13. February 24th, 2007 | 7:24 pm

    I’m thinking that i’ll be using this as a sig and as an motd on my linux workstation.

    now if only i could convince the admins to put it on the servers.

  14. February 26th, 2007 | 12:02 pm
  15. ericsongs
    February 26th, 2007 | 3:26 pm

    Hmmmmm….. would it be alright to have my personal checks imprinted with this “anti-EULA” agreement???
    (I’m kinda tired of that sunset-scene anyway!)

  16. anonymous
    March 5th, 2007 | 7:01 am

    Couldn’t it simply say “By existing, you agree…”?

  17. March 14th, 2007 | 1:18 pm

    [...] Reasonable Agreement: because EULA’s are hell of lame [...]

  18. March 15th, 2007 | 12:32 am

    I love what you guys are doing. I’m gonna add it to my emails, keep it up :)

  19. April 9th, 2007 | 9:27 pm

    [...] for us, the guys at Reasonable Agreement do! Take a look at it and remember to keep an eye for those tricky legally binding [...]

  20. JM
    May 22nd, 2007 | 6:10 am

    Since I can get checks printed with what ever I like, pictures of cats and stuff, how about a check with this printed on the back?

    God it’s got to be legal! It’s the same thing the phone companies do. “By cashing this check for $5.00 you agree to switch your long distance to ATT scam for ever co.”

  21. ssimon
    May 22nd, 2007 | 4:04 pm

    This is very clever. I do like the idea of attaching it to the check I send the cable company every month. I have a feeling a lawyer would call and tell me to stop. Or they’d just turn off the cable.

    Has there been any experience where the kid at Best Buy called over the manager and then refused to sell you whatever it was?

  22. May 27th, 2007 | 3:18 pm

    nice, a lot of the big stores dont even have you sign cc slips anymore, just the electronic thing. Then where can we stick these? Force it into the hands of the clerk? I like the check idea, did your bank let you do it?

  23. June 17th, 2007 | 10:16 pm

    [...]  The Small Print Project » ReasonableAgreement.org [...]

  24. Dominic
    June 19th, 2007 | 1:12 pm

    Cool Idea! I think I;ve found my new sig :)

    I like the shirt. I almost bought one, but the part about having read the agreement put me off. I would totally buy one if it said something like “By seeing this shirt you agree to be bound by…”

  25. July 11th, 2007 | 5:04 pm

    What about this:
    READ CAREFULLY: By reading this email, you agree to give me one million dollars whenever I ask for it. And I can do whatever I want with your stuff, forever.

  26. chris young
    July 22nd, 2007 | 4:54 am

    i think this is a wonderful thing you are doing. read the fine print was never more imperitive than it is on the net. please excuse poor grammer , i/m not really not dummy just a lousy typist

  27. Disclaimer Exploiter
    August 9th, 2007 | 7:53 am

    I’ve been sticking made up agreements on the bottom of emails for a while now. Recently I had to contact HP about a hard drive that had died in a newish computer, and they wanted my email address. I grudgingly gave them an address (unique, of course), and got them to confirm it wouldn’t be used for anything apart from this one support issue. Well, they started spamming it. I sent back a right rant, with a long list of things they have to do (the UK data protection act is good in some respects), along with the following bolted onto the end of the email. I never heard a peep out of them again!

    “Disclaimer. Acceptance by the recipient’s mail server to this message is acceptance of these terms by the recipient, as is any reply (including any “auto-response”). Each and every further communication to/cc/bcc any [mydomain] address will be charged an administrative fee of £1000 (one thousand pounds sterling) by the email administration. Any terms on the ends of your emails are invalidated and over ruled by these terms. Attachment or inclusion of any type of “disclaimer” is acceptance of this, and this disclaimer is final (i.e. cannot be overridden or invalidated). [My vanity domain pretending to be a real organisation]’s decision is final over any matter, and you may not sue or take any legal action over future or past communications/contact.”

  28. HarryChiling
    August 9th, 2007 | 9:59 pm

    It would be awesome to include some sort of arbitration agreement where they cover all costs of lawyers, courts fees, and/or arbitration.

  29. August 11th, 2007 | 7:16 am

    [...] exactly this issue that Andy Sternberg has been trying to fight with his project The Small Print Project, and Cory Doctorow with Reasonable [...]

  30. August 21st, 2007 | 7:11 am

    Having sold many Resale Rights products and paying extra for the liscense agreement, I wonder how legally binding these agreements are.

    Art

  31. August 23rd, 2007 | 5:03 am

    I agree! I agree with all agreements! I must agree! Agree, agree, agree!

  32. August 29th, 2007 | 6:50 am

    [...] screw that. It’s ridiculous and it’s abusive to customers. So abuse back with The Small Print Project. They will sell you stickers (100% of the proceeds got to the EFF) with the following text: READ [...]

  33. October 11th, 2007 | 12:11 pm

    [...] Copyright Â© READ CAREFULLY. By viewing any portion of this website you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer. (thanks to reasonableagreement.org) [...]

  34. November 21st, 2007 | 6:13 am

    [...] really outrageous and fit to point out how ridiculous those things are, I found inspiration at ReasonnablAgreement.com and modified it for my [...]

  35. htb
    November 21st, 2007 | 1:34 pm

    > The way the system should work is,
    > you buy something, you own it.

    This is unbelievably simplistic. How would you apply this to telephone service? You paid your bill last month, so you own the copper between your office and the CO?

    What people don’t seem to grasp is that you are NOT BUYING most kinds of software. You’re buying a *limited right to use* most software. You no more own most commercial software than you own the phone company.

  36. November 21st, 2007 | 1:42 pm

    [...] Source: Basically the exact same boilerplate message from ReasonableAgreement.org. [...]

  37. November 30th, 2007 | 9:57 am

    Here is a an example of the ‘tin-foil hat’ community’s reaction to this phenomenon…

    http://www.madamechao.com/w/xxiii/code/legal/terms.html

    It is arguable which is more disturbing, the audacity of the offending EULA’s or the resulting dementia it has inflicted on this site’s author.

  38. December 1st, 2007 | 12:58 pm

    I found this via my friend Jeff, and posted his version of the text to my LJ info page. (SixApart decided that they would let users flag other users’ posts/journals as porn, hate speech, etc. - *without* letting said user know till the journal had been suspended.)

  39. December 17th, 2007 | 11:18 am

    [...] would be lovely if we could go ahead and fix that. Unfortunately, section 2.1.3 (b)(3) of the EULA explicitly prohibits ‘reverse engineering, decompiling, disassembling or otherwise attempting [...]

  40. notbsd.org
    February 11th, 2008 | 7:01 pm

    Interestingly enough, I was able to get out of an abusive mobile phone contract by sticking a few of these stickers on the contract. The collections agency didn’t know what to do after I told them that the contract was void and showed them the stickers, and so they dropped my case.

    Thanks!

  41. February 20th, 2008 | 12:56 am

    [...] einiger Webdienste mit gleichen Waffen begegnen will, sollte sich die Initiative ReasonableAgreement.org [...]

  42. February 22nd, 2008 | 8:42 am

    Awesome stuff!

    I hope you won’t take offence at the criticism, but some of your images would benefit hugely from being GIFs instead of JPGs, as they’re non-photographic, but have suffered from the compression. [/patronising]

  43. defaria
    February 27th, 2008 | 3:10 pm

    “Who knows if this stuff is enforceable?” I know. It’s not. And cluttering up signatures with long winded irrelevant content only furthers the problem. I will not use such crap in my sigs…

  44. February 28th, 2008 | 10:12 am

    Yeah, while we are on the subject, what’s up with this-
    LEGALWISE…not right is it…?

    “SOMETHING TO TEXT ABOUT” (Nokia/ATT)

    more ‘contracts’? 1-888-567-8688

    http://www.att.com/fiftyback

    ‘$50 CASH’ + “Opt Out” + “Prescreened” =…”CRIME?”

    WHAT IS ALL THIS ABOUT IF NOT SLAVERY CONDONED BY GOVT?

  45. February 28th, 2008 | 10:15 am

    the ‘Captcha’ (another ’scare-tactic!)for my comments above; was

    “about emigrated”

    and this one? “…’rail’ Watson!” (I kid you not!)

  46. February 28th, 2008 | 10:19 am

    and here is the ‘pay-off’! “CAPTCHA”…’to prove you are not ROBOT-WARE…right? “…not to SCARE you or nuthin’”….

    injured Herbst

    I think that proves our contention

    CAPTCHA has long been seen as an INSULT to LIBERTY!

    PS! They just ‘changed it!’ OK here is new ‘random’ Message

    Neighbors Chandler

    alot can be ‘derived’ from that gem! REALLY! Anyway-can’t EFF or someone sue the pants off of CAPTCHA. Understand it is created in VENUZUELA for the OIL COMPANIES?

  47. February 28th, 2008 | 10:23 am

    WHAT ELSE CAN I SAY….CAPTCH is NOW….

    “POLICEMAN ABOARD!”

    Come on! GET RALPH NADERS GROUP AND SUE CARNEGIE MELLON FOR
    treason as it is employing someone who has not been VETTED
    (ie a FOREIGNER! YES! THIS “GENIUS” IS A SICK-BIRD! SORT OF “RENDITION” TO YOUR COMPUTER! GET IT? COME ON!)

    This Letter and All Contents Copyright 2008 Carson Omagh

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    …………….ie NO FAIR USE

  48. March 9th, 2008 | 4:03 pm

    [...] Frankly, it’s all bullshit. The way the system should work is, you buy something, you own it. The law of the land governs your interactions with the seller. What’s the point of having a consumer-protection law if all it takes to get around it is to announce that you’ve agreed to waive your rights by buying something? If consumer protection laws don’t protect people who buy stuff, whom do they protect? LINK [...]

  49. March 9th, 2008 | 4:11 pm

    Great post!

    Remember, folks:

    The Large Print Giveth, the Small Print Taketh Away.

    Al Czervic
    Editor
    The Catskill Commentator
    http://www.catskillcommentator.com

  50. March 22nd, 2008 | 9:03 pm

    Hi,
    What a classic. For years these managerial morons have put us through agreeing to this crap as a means to proceed, like having a gun to our heads.
    But you forget the snag for the common user - they have the power to insert the spyware, and as a user rather than a tech geek, we/you/me have no power or expertise to find it. Even Microsoft are dumping junk into PC’s to make a nag screen come up about registering your operating system. So, you might win a battle, but the managerial morons with their meetings and Powerpoint presentations and pats on each others backs, and jolly good show old chap, will win to a degree in the end. Just because they have the power and connections to do so, not through any skills or sense, or commonsense.
    Have a super day, great site, like Duggie MacArthur I will return.

  51. May 11th, 2008 | 11:23 am

    I’m a senior citizen who’s neither a techie nor a business expert. All I know is what I think. For years, I’ve advocated that companies be required to advertise only the “final” price, not the price after taxes and a bunch of other add-ons. I also oppose any “fine print” whatsoever. Why should the buyer have to “beware”? Make it all bottom-line, with nothing concealed. Tell it like it is, not like it is after a bunch of tricky dancing on the part of the seller. I know I’m naive and idealistic, but why can’t an attempt be made to impliment a policy of above-boardmanship? Would be interested in a response from the younger, obviously more sophisticated guys and gals.

  52. Nick Shapter
    June 9th, 2008 | 5:34 pm

    Now I want a checkbook with this waiver on the checks near the endorsement line.

  53. Derrick
    July 2nd, 2008 | 6:35 pm

    Great! I’m going to tattoo this on my arm.

  54. Jeddy Khan
    August 9th, 2008 | 11:31 am

    Would software companies die a slow and painful death if EULA is banned or consider a form of extortion, hence becoming illegal? Or will these companies survive and do business like all other companies try harder to make a more reliable and better product and see if people are interested in actually buying it. After people have bought it and it is causing all kinds of problems the software company will refund the money or replace it with a better version. If car companies can do it why can’t software companies do the same?

  55. September 4th, 2008 | 4:15 pm

    Brilliant article !

  56. November 4th, 2008 | 4:01 pm

    [...] I’ve had enough. While researching some of this stuff I came across a website that was apparently created by people that also are not too fond of the ridiculous direction that software licensing has taken of late, I give you Reasonable Agreement. [...]

  57. November 4th, 2008 | 4:02 pm

    [...] I’ve had enough. While researching some of this stuff I came across a website that was apparently created by people that also are not too fond of the ridiculous direction that software licensing has taken of late, I give you Reasonable Agreement. [...]

  58. December 2nd, 2008 | 9:53 am

    cool articles !

Leave a reply